Lean Manufacturing: eliminating waste and producing according to value
Lean is the exported version of the Toyota system: a way of looking at the whole process by asking what adds value for the customer and eliminating the rest, with a set of techniques applied in a certain order.
- Reading time
- 9 minutes
- Sources
- 1 paper, 1 book, 1 thesis
- Tool
- Reading only
In one line
Lean Manufacturing is a production philosophy that seeks to eliminate everything that does not add value for the customer, involving everyone in the plant in that task.
What it is
According to the Icesi University paper, the term Lean Manufacturing was coined in the book The Machine That Changed the World (Womack and others, 1990), which compiled the best practices of the global automotive industry and highlighted those of Toyota. It clarifies that concern for reducing waste did not begin at Toyota: Henry Ford was one of the first to pursue that goal. Lean is, in essence, a relentless pursuit of waste, one that challenges many prejudices inherited from mass production.
Meyers and Stephens add the vocabulary: "lean thinking" comes from the Toyota production system and from Womack and Jones's book Lean Thinking, and lean manufacturing is the concept whereby all production personnel work together to eliminate waste. Its philosophy is that of added value: cost elements that do not add value to the final product are eliminated. And they put forward a concrete design idea: a fundamental principle is the product-oriented layout, with less work in process, quality problems that are easier to see and less floor space.
How it is applied: the techniques and their order
The Icesi University paper proposes an implementation model with continuous improvement (kaizen) at the center and the techniques ordered according to what they contribute:
| Technique | What it contributes |
|---|---|
| Value stream map (VSM) | See the complete process, from order to delivery, and separate what adds value from what does not |
| 5S | Order and cleanliness as a discipline |
| Flexible work systems | Manufacturing cells with operators who know the whole cell |
| Standard work | Document the best practice to sustain improvements and to train people |
| SMED | Drastically reduce changeovers |
| TPM | Turn the "lost time" spent on maintenance into productive time |
| Just in time (with kanban) | Produce and move the right quantity at the right moment |
| Jidoka | Prevent errors in the process, with inspection at the source |
| Heijunka | Leveled production, with the product mix replicated in the smallest possible interval |
Each one has its own article on this site: VSM, 5S, SMED, TPM, just in time, kanban and jidoka. And the shared goal is the list of wastes.
Real example
The University of Azuay thesis on the LACPRIMA dairy plant is a good example of how the technique is chosen according to the problem. It walked through five areas (raw material reception, pasteurization, molding, packaging and coding, and storage) and assigned tools: 5S for the disorder and items out of place, andon for raw material quality control and the lack of signage, poka-yoke for the product waste when filling the molds, a spaghetti diagram for the molds stored in two places and value stream mapping for the unrecorded times. The conclusion of the diagnosis is that the main problems were the lack of records and procedures, which produced a significant amount of unrecoverable waste of raw materials.
Meyers and Stephens, for their part, tell the case of a golf equipment manufacturer that had six months of work-in-process inventory with a process-oriented layout: by switching to a product-oriented one, it cut that to less than two days.
Benefits
- Less inventory, less space and shorter lead times.
- Quality problems are more visible because there is less material piled up between workstations.
- It involves the people who know the process best.
Limitations to keep in mind
- The techniques should not be applied haphazardly: each one contributes a different lesson, as the Icesi University paper warns.
- Reducing inventory exposes the problems that inventory was hiding, and that is uncomfortable before things get better.
- It is a philosophy, and as such it requires cultural change: without people's participation, it ends up as a bunch of posters.
In summary
Lean is looking at the process with the question "does this add value for the customer?" and eliminating what does not. Its techniques (VSM, 5S, SMED, TPM, JIT, jidoka, heijunka) are not a menu: they are chosen and ordered according to the waste you want to attack. Combined with the variation reduction of Six Sigma, it gives you Lean Six Sigma.
More on Methodologies and Philosophies
Fordism: the assembly line and mass production
Fordism took Taylor's scientific management and built it into an assembly line: standardized parts, minimal tasks and large production runs. It worked very well as long as the market wanted the same thing for everyone.
Methodology map: which one fits each problem
Taylorism, Fordism, Toyotism, Lean, Six Sigma, TOC and total quality do not compete: they answer different questions. This guide puts them on a timeline and suggests which one to start with depending on the problem you have.
SWOT matrix
SWOT crosses what happens inside (strengths and weaknesses) with what happens outside (opportunities and threats) to decide which strategies are worth pursuing. It works for a company, a maintenance department or a project.